CMIT 321 Ethical Hacking Executive Proposal Free Essay Example, 1250 words

Metasploit Pro closes the gap in vulnerability testing by presenting the risk in an objective way and through collaboration with Nexpose - a vulnerability management solution with the capability to tell the â€Å"who, what and where† of the risk, remediation programs can be prioritized (Rapid7, 2014). Third, Metasploit is used to manage phishing and protect employee credentials. It is recognized that phishing is the third most popular attack vector in a company. There is always a grey area when it comes to an organization measuring and managing phishing exposure and gauging the effectiveness applicable training and technical controls. Metasploit gauges the effectiveness of a security program by conducting simulated phishing crusades to control exposure to phishing attacks. Product reviews, case studies and customer recommendations Metasploit has been tested in a variety of fields, and it is found to be effective. The President of Offensive Security Jim O’Gorman attributed the use of the application to time savings and fewer interruptions in organizational activities. According to him â€Å", Time savings is our prime motivation for using Metasploit Pro (Rapid7, 2014). †Another security consultant, Ben Holder of Lumenate termed Metasploit as a useful software for delivering closed-loop vulnerability reports that facilitate the development of remediation activities. We will write a custom essay sample on CMIT 321 Ethical Hacking: Executive Proposal or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now According to Holder, discovery of vulnerabilities is simplified by 70-80% by using Rapid7 products. With respect to phishing capabilities, Metasploit is a great business driver. Tim Pospisil, an IT Security Supervisor at Nebraska Public Power District, commented â€Å"What really facilitate our move to the top were the phishing provisions of Metasploit. .. According to me, that was a critical business drive. (Rapid7, 2014)† during an interview. Personal experiences with Metasploit Having installed the free 14-day trial edition of Metaploit Pro, I realized that the software is far much beneficial than thought. The first feature that was beneficial in my case is the ability to test the network for weak and reused passwords from multiple accounts. This feature is really important in that security professional can detect common employee sources of password cracking synonymous with many organizations. In addition to cracking the operating system accounts, Metasploit Pro can initiate brute force attacks on multiple accounts such as databases, web servers, email accounts and remote administration accounts. This software is advanced in evading detection by common anti-malware solutions.

A Research Study On Alzheimer s Disease - 951 Words

As people age, many different aspects of their lives change. These changes can be a result of anything from the environment to biology. A specific biological change that occurs in approximately 5 million Americans over the age of 65 is memory loss (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013). The medical term for this loss of memory is called Alzheimer’s disease, sometimes also referred to as dementia. These changes in memory also affect thinking and behavior that get in the way of everyday things people do. According to Mary S. Mittelman and Dr. PH Cynthia Epstein, the authors of the Alzheimer’s Health Care Handbook, Alzheimer’s disease is a neurological illness that prevents the brain from functioning effectively, with†¦show more content†¦Mild cognitive impairment is the stage where symptoms, such as memory problems, begin to show, but are not serious enough to affect a person’s everyday life. Alzheimer’s dementia is the most severe stag of the disease. This is the stage the symptoms seriously affect a person’s daily life. Memory loss is a significant symptom, but other symptoms include: difficulty finding words, judgment and reasoning difficulties, and trouble identifying objects and faces (University of Maryland Medical Center, 2013). Although, this disease affects about 5 million Americans over 65, the highest percentage of the population affected is 80 years of age or older. My grandmother is 75 years old, and is currently being affected by this disease. She is in the Alzheimer’s dementia stage. This is the stage where mild symptoms turn to severe. Questions and stories become extremely repetitive, and her everyday life and functional ability have been affected. This can become frustrating for people around her, even though it is not her fault, and in turn it can make my grandmother extremely frustrated as well. In addition to cognition and behavior change, this disease can limit a person’s freedom. People affected by this disease forget how to perform daily activities such as hygiene related tasks, or more seriously, driving. Once a person forgets how to

Is Shakespeares Portrayal of the Common free essay sample

Is Shakespeare’s portrayal of the common people of Rome realistic? Why did the common people of Rome kill Cinna the poet? Shakespeare’s portrayal of the common people of Rome is realistic since he shows how people act when they are part of a crowd. The image of disordered society also influences the act of Rome populace since there are no rules. Shakespeare realized that people tend to follow the crowd; therefore, he uses this point to exemplify mob mentality which is prevalent throughout the play. In Act I, the commoners are cheering for Caesar after the defeat of Pompey, Marullus, a tribune, reminds them of how they had similarly cheered for Pompey in the same streets. The people once wait â€Å"with patient expectation, to see great Pompey pass the streets of Rome† (I. i. 42-43) This shows how the crowed seems to be easily swayed in their allegiance. This illustrates how fickle the people are and how they are able to quickly change loyalties to whoever is in power. We will write a custom essay sample on Is Shakespeares Portrayal of the Common or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Not much has changed in modern times. Most people still tend to follow whoever is in charge because they feel it is safer to stick with what everybody else is doing. This is an example of mob mentality. Mark Antony understands this fact about the people and uses it to his advantage when the conspirators later assassinate Caesar. The commoners’ new loyalty to Caesar is similar to the ease with which Cassius convinces Brutus (with no real evidence) that Caesar wants to be king and should therefore be murdered. This is another example of mob mentality. In Act III, Scene II, Brutus is the first to speak to the crowd after the death of Caesar. Although Shakespeare portrays the commoners of Rome as people who can be easily persuaded, he also shows how they are reasonable. The crowd decides that they will listen to Brutus before deciding on anything. One commoner yells out, â€Å"I will hear Brutus speak. â€Å" while another says â€Å"†¦When severally we hear them rendered. † Brutus then speaks to the commoners and explains why Caesar had to be killed for the good of Rome. He manages to convince them that Caesar was too ambitious and would have ruined Rome. The people, with their minds made up, begin to chant that they want Brutus to be the new ruler, forgetting all about how theyd recently been singing Caesars praises. They call Caesar out as a tyrant and that â€Å"†¦ We are blest that Rome is rid of him. † This lasts until Antony speaks. Antony is a far better judge of human nature than Brutus and he uses that to his advantage. He tells the crowd of Caesar’s good works and his concern for the people. Within minutes, Antony manages to turn the crowd against Brutus, Cassius, and the other conspirators, once again demonstrating the fickleness of the crowd. The scene at the beginning of Act I where Marullus and Flavius reprimand the commoners for being fickle foreshadows the events of Act III. Antony’s speech causes the people of Rome to become enraged. Brutus first sways them to the plight of the conspirators, but Antony manages to convince them to riot in the end. They become worked up and eager to cause violence. This causes them to kill the poet Cinna in Act III, Scene III. Cinna is in the wrong place at the wrong time. The mob demonstrates an act of herd behaviour, which is when individuals in a group act together without planned directions. They ask Cinna for his name and after learning what it is, they immediately attack him even Cinna explains that he is Cinna the poet, not Cinna the conspirator. The crowd, hungry for blood, kill the innocent poet anyway, explaining that they should. This shows how the crowd, in the heat of the moment, acts irrationally. They realise that he is the wrong Cinna, but they are so enraged, they slay him anyway. Still driven by fury, the commoners then decide to torch the homes of Brutus, Cassius, Decius Brutus, Casca and Ligarius. In the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses scenes to comment on the nature of mob mentality. The scenes where the crowd is easily persuaded to switch allegiance is a realistic portrayal of the common people of Rome. Today, people are still as easily convinced to change their minds. The scene where Cinna the poet is killed shows a juxtaposition of both violence and irrational thought. Violence in that they kill an innocent man, and irrational thought for the completely unjustified excuse for doing so. This insight into the phenomena of mob mentality is accurate and still rings true in modern times.